FBI vs Apple: Competitive smartphones makers caution in taking stand iPhone encryption battle: As the rivalry between the giant tech company Apple and the US government continues over the security system of Apple, the other companies in the industry tend not to interfere and are trying their best to keep a low profile. They are perhaps cautious whether we should take a stand or not in this battle regarding the encryption of an iPhone. Most of the companies belong to the Asian subcontinent. This region is responsible for producing about eat smart phones for every day at 10 smart phones which are sold in the entire world and thus they operate in a very legal and political landscape.
FBI vs Apple: Competitive smartphones makers caution in taking stand iPhone encryption battle
Out of the several companies it was only the Chinese company Huawei Who supported the Apple CEO in this rivalry. The also thing that they should not encrypt any gadget which belongs to someone else and that also holds true for the shooter was found in California back in December. The company also claims that they invest quite a lot of money on privacy of the smartphones and thus it is very important to uphold the security system which is beneficial for every consumer.
The Chinese-based company said that there are certain things that are very important for the consumer for example privacy which even if the government insists cannot be weakened. According to Lenovo Company, they said that this is a serious issue which requires a lot of time thinking to be sorted out rightly. We consider such a situation because they realize that the same issue could have occurred to them.
LG Company said that privacy and security is something that is a very serious issue and so even the government needs some restriction in this regard. Read, Apple developing new security system that would make it impossible to break into a locked iPhone.
Several companies realize that on one hand when a customer security is essential, we should also consider an issue related to natural security especially when that causes a threat to the common people. For instance several countries do not have laws that the the companies can use in such a situation.
Thus, this issue should still be given more time as well as consideration.
-
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق